The first 60 seconds decide everything — we find where onboarding loses them.
Book discovery call →A product audit isn't a UX review. It's an audit of intent — the gap between what your product promises and what a new user actually experiences. The catch: you're too close to see it.
You're too close to see it. The product team knows too much to experience the product like a new user ever will.
Most reviews fix the button. We ask why the button exists at all — the strategic gap behind the surface friction.
Friction you've stopped noticing is quietly costing you activation, conversion and retention every single day.
Consistency is credibility. Every finding on every teardown follows the same shape — observation, fix, and the cost of doing nothing.
What the team meant to build — we give them credit first. We diagnose, we don't mock.
What a new user actually experiences in the product — specific and observable.
The distance between intent and reality. This is the callout — the finding itself.
The recommendation. Sometimes a UI change. Sometimes a decision to kill the feature entirely.
The business consequence of doing nothing — written as lost growth, never as design opinion.
An anonymized example — the same shape, applied to a real-world growth gap.
Onboarding wants a new user to connect a data source and see their first live dashboard.
After sign-up, the user lands on an empty dashboard with no data — and the “Add source” button is buried in settings.
The product's core value is trapped behind an empty state most new users never get past.
Pull data-source connection into the first-run flow, and seed a sample dataset so the dashboard is never empty on day one.
New users churn before activation. The product never gets to prove its value, and acquisition spend leaks straight out the top of the funnel.
We start strategic — if the promise is broken, the execution findings are symptoms, not causes — then move through the journey, stage by stage.
Does the positioning match what the product actually does?
Does every major feature serve the core job to be done?
Is the differentiation visible in the product itself?
The framework is the lens, not the checklist. We draw only from the stages where a real finding exists — silence on a stage means it passed.
Every finding, structured — Observation, Fix and Cost of Inaction — grouped by strategic and execution layer.
Every finding ranked by growth impact and effort — what to fix first, what to fix next, what to stop worrying about.
We walk you and your team through every finding live — every question answered, next steps agreed.
A focused engagement with one fixed price, quoted after a discovery call.
We learn your product, your ICP, and the growth stage you're most worried about.
A single fresh session — the one lens your team can never replicate, because they know too much.
You get the Growth Gap Report and a live walkthrough. We focus where you asked — and flag what we find.
No. A UX review asks whether a button is in the right place. We ask why the button exists at all. It's an audit of intent — strategy first, execution second.
Proximity blindness is permanent. Your team knows the product too well to experience it like a new user. The fresh-eyes lens is the one thing they can't replicate at any price.
Yes. Tell us the stage you're most worried about and we deliver there first — then flag anything else we find along the way.
One fixed price for the whole engagement, quoted after a discovery call — no hourly billing.

Tell us what you're working on. We'll show you how we'd help — no pitch, no pressure.